It shows that a crime is a crime no matter your age. If that is the case, then their parents should be responsible for the consequences. The juvenile court system may try a method of rehabilitation with the young criminal and return him or her to the streets very quickly.
Research shows that there is not just one single cause for delinquency. Meanwhile, juvenile courts are also seeing more cases of non-violent crime. It may actually harm the mild offenders to have contact with youths who have committed violent crimes.
In conclusion, public opinion on the issue is fairly decisive. The judge decides whether or not the juvenile has broken the law and whether or not the juvenile is guilty. These crimes are nowhere near as violent and damaging to society. One key point of many programs is to teach juveniles conflict resolution.
However, the sentences in these homes tend to be lighter and shorter than the sentences doled out to those criminals who were tried in adult court Reynolds. This discrimination undermines the credibility of the juvenile justice system.
Individuals that exhibit these qualities very often commit violent crimes. Today, some people are saying a way to make the world safer is for juveniles to be tried as adults. Certainly, some of the situations of these youth s are probably sad and terrible, but that does not excuse their behavior.
Some teens may be held there as runaways or shoplifters. Frankly, juvenile court had years to get it right and they have not. Unfortunately, that was enough years ago coupled with the overcrowding of prisons that some of those offenders have been released.
Other than the horrific tragedy of Columbine, there have been many catastrophes involving juveniles not being tried as adults, but for what they did, they definitely should have been. It is only logical to say that the juvenile has engaged in adult behavior and has declared him or herself an adult in crime.
If one looks past the statistics for a moment at the actual facts, it is clear that the tougher sentences handed out in adult courts to juveniles will help deter crime. The decline that occurred in most of the U. However, since this is governed by individual states, there is no consistency to which juveniles get transferred and for what crime which may explain why certain cities and areas are having more difficulty Collier.
The figures for juveniles committing crimes that are serious, heterogeneous, or non-serious mirror those of offenders between the ages of eighteen and twenty U. Criminals often have access to education in prison that might help some young people. A child who is 17, only will wait a couple of months before their 18 and get out of the juvenile facility, but an 18 year old may get years before they can get out if they did the same crime.
Violent crimes can be defined as murder, rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault, larceny-theft and the like depending on state law pbs.
However, the government has already deemed this age group able to have a job or drive a car. Furthermore, potential juvenile offenders would be deterred from committing violent crimes which would lead to an overall decline in violent crimes perpetrated by juveniles.
Is that fair in the rights of the 18 year old? By sending adolescents to jail, parents can be let off the hook. Such acts may not go unnoticed; the criminals must be dealt with in a legal manner. Other studies believe in the power of rehabilitation to save most, if not all, of these youths.
In adult courts judges have fewer choices, and sometimes the only option to choose is prison.
Williams is one of many young adults facing the prospect of life in prison as the debate over whether juveniles should be tried as adults rages on.
Today, virtually every juvenile offender who has a past criminal history, or is arrested for a violent crime like rape or murder, is tried in an adult court. For example, non-white youths in California are eight times more likely than white youths to be sentenced by an adult court to incarceration in a youth facility and three times more likely to be transferred to adult court for trial and sentencing Young, L.
Incourts with juvenile jurisdiction handled an estimated 1. No matter what age someone is, they must learn to take responsibility for their actions and be made to understand the consequences of bad decisions. The current system provides no viable mechanism for reviewing a case after a young person has grown up and matured.Trying these teens as adults unjust and unfair, there other alternatives that our society can turn to, to help make our communities better places to live.
We need to realize that children are our future, and we throwing their future away. Essays Related to Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults? 1. When Juveniles Are Charged as Adults.3/5(8).
List of Disadvantages of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults. 1. It puts adolescent offenders at risk. Adult prisons are places where juveniles can be easily abused and harmed. When it comes to trying teens in court as adults. Some say stop trying them as adults and try them as juveniles, others say they must be tried as adults when they commit adult crimes.
“In juvenile court they want to help us make better choices.” That, in a nutshell, is why children should not be tried as adults. The research is clear that children in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to reoffend than if they are held in the juvenile justice system.
Essay on Juveniles Should Be Tried as Adults Words | 8 Pages "Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time." -- David Grusin and Morgan Ames Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult.
i think that juveniles should be charged as adults when the crime involves a murder and/or gang relations.
iknow | Student I don't think juveniles should be tried as adults for many of reasons.Download